UPA cabinet, Ram sethu & the genetic code:



Standing against vs standing up

Now that public memory is slowly receding from the anti-Ram affadavit filed by the upa government its time to look at it unemotionally and objectively.

Jiddu krishnamurthy has said that mind evolves over generations. It is a product of what it has been subjected to. Historically speaking Muslims have been invaders at least in the Indian context. Their mindset is one of aggression, killing, rape and plunder. They have lived by the sword and you can see echo of it in the modern world as spilling blood is not considered being un-Islamic. A Caucasian christian is known to have the tag of a coloniser.He has ruled many countries worldwide put people to slavery with devastating effects and has killed & plundered though rape is not something which is associated with him. You can see that sense of superiority in them when they deal with other people. It is so plain and visible.

Hindus on the other hand were a good hosts for both the muslim hordes and the later caucasian christian colonisers. This over a 1000 year history has made them less aggressive personalities. I'ts surprising that even a casual browse of Hindu religious books can calm down a person even though one of the most holy books "the gita" has its origins on the battlefield calling for action and in the other holy book "Ramayana" there was the epic warfare across ocean.

But things are changing and there is strong urge among the hindu youth to claim their place on earth. This is fundamentally against the known stereo type of hindus. The secular world of India which includes rightwing Christians and Muslims are having great difficulty in accepting it as a reality. Hence if you see any aggressive defensive posture by hindus it is attacked in a co-ordinated way by both Indo christians and Indo muslims. It's interesting to note that in other parts of the world muslims and christians are not great friends.

When the nation is emerging out of slavery and dependence it looks upon to its leaders to show some leadership qualities. Leadership qualities like "Self -respect" dignity and the courage to defend it. There is fundamental difference between standing against and standing up. Standing against is opposing and can be enemy action, but standing up is not enemy action and it just means safe guarding your self-respect.

The majority of the UPA cabinet are from the hindu religion. They are all hindus first. The least they can do when their god was questioned was to stand up and protest. This has nothing to do with politics. Its basic self respect. Let's see how the UPA cabinet has responded to the offensive affadavit filed by the union government.

It's amazing that the statement of Ms.Sonia has been swallowed by all the hindu ministers in her cabinet. This has nothing do with secularism because secularists from other religions are first either a muslim or a christian and later a secularist. Why was almost the entire hindu cabinet silent? Why are they so timid? agreed that they have all acquired the defective genetic code but they should have made efforts to take the nation away from the mindset of crawling and bowing ! Are these leaders making the same mistake of the multitude of small rulers who ruled india earlier made.. the inability to stand up for their rights.. the inability to fight... the inability to defend their self respect... Does this timidity explains why a handful of invaders could rule the nation for thousand years.

If they cannot utter a meek whisper of protest.. against the most blatant attack on their basic faith, can we expect them to stand up to face other challanges of the nation ? We give two recent examples of this government's inability to stand up for the rights of its people...

Example 1:US Ambassador Mr Mulford's statement:
Ahead of the IAEA meeting on the Iran issue, the US ambassador to India Mr.Mulford said that if India did not vote against Tehran’s nuclear programme, the fallout on the Indo-US nuclear deal in the US Congress would be ‘devastating’.

The UPA government was silent and this cabinet consisting of heroes of anti hinduism were silent too.... it was left to Mr Vajpayee the opposition leader to respond.. he said “The statement of the US Ambassador to India is outrageous. It violates all diplomatic norms. Ambassadors are not required to make personal remarks denigrating their host country,” “The reaction of the Ministry of External Affairs to the Ambassador’s remarks is routine. It hardly expresses the indignation of the people of the sovereign and independent republic of India.”

It was after this that the UPA government gave out a formal protest. What has prevented this govt from protesting. It had to look to the opposition for leadership... .

Example 2: Indians attacked in Germany:

Eight indian men were attacked by a mob of around 50 Germans at a street party in recently in the small town of Mügeln in the eastern German state of Saxony. What was the response of the government.. silence.. it was left to one of the tallest leaders from the opposition,Mrs.Sushma swaraj who said that the German ambassador to India should be summoned for a protest.
Response of the upa govt. You guessed it right... silence

Should not the members of the government of the now resurgent india demonstrate that freedom means both political and psychological and its time to make attempts to change their psychological dna code from slavery to freedom.

This frontal attack against hindusim has already turned many moderate hindus into right and far right wing hindus. Right wing hinduism is in very small numbers today as compared to right wing christians or right wing muslims. Its a wonder why these secularists of india want to contribute to the growth of right wing Hinduism.May be that is what Hinduism needs now. It appears that the UPA government wants to provoke the moderate hindus so that it can "complain" of right wing Hindusim.

The response of other religions to this affadavit was interesting. Some Muslim organisations in south India came to the defence of religious rights but not in defence of hindusim. That is some response. However for all its claims of being a fair and just religion none of the Indo-christian organizations made even a general statement on this. True christians would have come out with a statement to uphold civility.But Indian church is yet to learn the civility and politeness of the western church.

For the hindu ministers of the UPA cabinet who have a defective genetic code we offer them inspiration from other world stories,
1. Christian denominations disagree with each other but neither question the existence of Christ
2. Muslim nations fight among themselves but neither question the existence of Allah

Members of the UPA cabinet, you have stood up to challenges for your political career and fought for it. You can do the same for your faith. We expect you to stand up. Remember standing up is not standing against.We request the UPA cabinet to stand up to the many challenges which the nation is facing.

Some examples:
6 Decades of pakistan sponsored terrorism
They have crossed the border with impunity.
Stand up and cross into their border once....
131 chinese incursions into Arunachal pradesh
Stand up and make one incursion into Tibet
Olympics are coming soon
Does this government have a solution?
Stand up and show action or atleast a viable plan

Undercurrent congragulates Mr.Jairam Ramesh, union minister of state for commerce,who had the courage to stand up and asked Ms Ambika soni to resign in wake of the Anti ram controversy. He was also the one to proclaim loudly that Arunachal pradesh is part of India in protest against chinese incursions. Did he go against the party? No, but he stood up. It is that characterstic which the nation is looking for.